Skip to content
Research and sources

What is Evidence dossier?

An evidence dossier is the set of verified sources mapped to each claim of a story — confirmed sources, AI-suggested sources, divergent ones, per-claim verification status, and editorial revision history — accessible for pre-publication review and post-publication audit.

In short

  • Every claim in the story is traced back to the source supporting it.
  • Sources are classified as confirmed, AI-suggested, or divergent.
  • The dossier is archived and auditable after publication, per story.

Full definition

In a verifiable editorial AI platform, the evidence dossier is the central artifact — the thing that distinguishes this kind of tool from a generic AI writer. Every story produced ships with a structured set of sources consulted during research, mapped against each claim in the resulting text.

The dossier isn't a post-hoc report — it's the product of research done before drafting. When an editor opens a story for review, they see not only the text but the sources backing each paragraph, with status labels (confirmed, suggested, divergent) and the editorial revisions applied so far.

For a newsroom, the strategic value of the dossier shows up in three moments: editorial review (faster, safer decisions), an internal investigation or reader complaint (the full trail is accessible), and upcoming regulatory compliance (per-story audit, expected by emerging AI-in-journalism regulations).

How it works

  1. During research, AI searches sources in real time and classifies each by reliability and relevance to the pitch.
  2. During drafting, each claim in the text is linked to the source(s) supporting it — that mapping is what populates the dossier.
  3. Sources the AI proposes but that need editorial validation are flagged as 'suggested' until an editor confirms.
  4. Sources that contradict each other are flagged as 'divergent' — the editor picks the prevailing version and the rationale is logged.
  5. After publication, the dossier is versioned: subsequent edits produce new versions while preserving history.

Practical example

In a sports-coverage story, AI confirms the team's official starting lineup via the club's primary source (confirmed), suggests a tactical analysis from a specialist blog (suggested — pending validation), and detects a discrepancy between two outlets on attendance numbers (divergent — the editor picks the version to publish and the rationale stays in the history).

Evidence dossier vs Traditional post-production fact-check

Traditional fact-check happens after the story is written, usually as a separate step before publication or in response to a reader complaint. An evidence dossier is built during research — it guides the writing rather than correcting it after. The difference is structural: one defers the problem, the other prevents it.

Frequently asked questions

Does the dossier include confidential sources?

No. Confidential sources (in investigative journalism, for example) are not entered into the dossier accessible to the platform — that workflow stays with the human newsroom under standard editorial practice.

Who has access to a story's dossier?

Editors and editors-in-chief of the publication, per configured permissions. In media groups, directors may have consolidated visibility; editors of each title see only what's theirs.

Can the dossier be exported for external audit?

Yes. The dossier can be exported in auditable formats (PDF and structured JSON) for internal investigations, regulatory requirements, or reader responses. The content respects data protection law and the publication's editorial AI policy.

See how Typedit uses evidence dossier

The verifiable editorial AI platform applies this concept in production — at Brazilian newsrooms with 10M+ monthly readers.

Related terms

What is Evidence dossier? — Typedit glossary | Typedit